SoundEagle Reading
Manuscript Assessment Criteria
Reign not SoundEagle’s Flight, For I seek thy Crested Might. has made the manuscript assessment criteria available as a thorough checklist for writers striving to improve their manuscripts for publication.
Click here to contact SoundEagle















1. Genre

How well does the book fulfill the characteristics of the nominated genre?

2. Title

How well does the title reflect the content and direction of the book? Suggestions for alternative title:

3. Content

To what extent is the content of this book appropriate for the nominated audience?
Is the plot plausible?
To what extent is the story entertaining?
Is the plot developed at an appropriate and consistent pace?
How well is the major plot developed?
To what extent do subplots enrich the story?
Is the organisation of all elements of the plot tight and devoid of contradictions and inconsistencies?
To what extent are devices other than narrative (such as direct speech, diary entries, letters and newspaper reports) employed to develop the plot?
To what extent are individual chapters well organised — each with a clear beginning, body and end?
Where given, are chapter titles relevant?

4. Narrative Style

To what extent does the narrative style enable the development of the plot?
How effective is the use of 1st person / 2nd person / 3rd person viewpoint?
Are techniques such as chronological-sequential narration, flashbacks and prequel-sequel narration effective in the book?

5. Characterization

Are there an appropriate number of characters?
Are all the characters relevant to the plot development and the setting, and to the depiction of major characters?
To what extent are the major characters well portrayed and developed (appearance, personality, manner, values, behaviour, strengths, weaknesses etc)?
To what extent are the minor characters well portrayed and developed (appearance, personality, manner, values, behaviour, strengths, weaknesses etc)?
To what extent are all the characters believable?
To what extent are these characters drawn so that the target audience can relate to them?

6. Dialogue

To what extent does each character use convincing and appropriate vocabulary and expression?
Is dialogue used effectively to depict characters?
Is the dialogue between characters believable and natural?
If characters use a language other than English, is it accurately written?
If characters use language that is written in a manner to suggest an accent or dialect, is the language consistent throughout the book?

7. Language

To what extent is the language of the book (narrative and dialogue) appropriate to the nominated audience?
To what extent does the author clearly communicate his/her concepts through the book?
Is the vocabulary accurately used in context?
Is unusual vocabulary (if applicable) explained within the context of the book?
Is the vocabulary rich and varied?
Is the expression clear?
Is the expression concise?
Is the spelling accurate?
Is correct grammar used throughout the manuscript?
Is the syntax accurate and flowing?
Is the punctuation correct throughout the book?
Are verb tenses used correctly throughout the book?

8. Setting

Is the setting vividly created?
Are details of the setting accurate?
To what extent does the setting help to develop the plot and/or characterization of the book?

9. Theme

Is the theme clearly articulated or implied in this book?

10. Illustrations

To what extent do the illustrations (such as diagrams, graphs, charts, tables, figures, clip arts, drawings, schematics, plans, maps, photos and/or statistical data) support or enhance the text of the book?

11. Technical Information

Is the technical information relevant and consistent?
Is the technical information convincing, up-to-date, and/or substantiated by references or citations?

12. Presentation

How effective is the layout (word spacing, line spacing, white space, margins, indentations, chapter headings and subheadings)?
How effective are the font selection(s) and size(s)?
How consistent is the spelling (where alternative spellings may be accurate but only one of the alternatives should be chosen and used throughout the manuscript)?
How consistent are the use of abbreviations and the use of numerals instead of words (or vice versa)?

13. Documentation

Is the referencing consistent, accurate and/or adequate?
Are appendices and other supporting materials required, appropriate and/or well-organised?
If required or present, are the title page, table of contents, acknowledgements, bibliography, reference list, index(es), synopsis and/or sleeve notes appropriate or satisfactory?
Reign not SoundEagle's Flight, For I seek thy Crested Might.
Overall Assessment


Corresponding Readiness of the Manuscript




Final Edit



Constructive Edit + Final Edit



Mentoring + Constructive Edit + Final Edit



Extensive Mentoring + Constructive Edit + Final Edit




Overall Grade and Evaluation:

Click here to contact SoundEagle
The DNA of a Successful Book [INFOGRAPHIC]

The DNA of a Successful Book [INFOGRAPHIC]

Like this infographic? See more Infographics and Interesting Articles from Infographic List.

14 comments on “Manuscript

  1. Hi, I shared this post as well as the post “Writing” on my Twitter page. I consider these posts as very useful and hope my readers (more than 1.000 on Twitter) will find them useful too.

    Thank you for your efforts! Much appreciated!

    Best regards,

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Thank you very much. I appreciate your efforts as you have very unique blog! Wish you all te best in your future endeavouors!


    Liked by 2 people

  3. […] soundeagle.wordpress.com Rate this:Share thisFacebookTwitterОдноклассникиВКонтактеMail.RuYouTubeLinkedInPinterestEmailPrintAM/ENAM/ESAM/FRAM/ITAM/DEAM/ROAM/GRAM/RUAM/GEAM/ILAM/AEAM/INAM/CNAM/JPLike this:Like12 bloggers like this. […]

    Liked by 1 person

  4. You put a lot of hard work into this piece, SoundEagle. It will help many writers who need good advice.
    blessings ~ maxi

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Thanks for bringing me here! Love the innovative way in which you write stuff here. It must have taken you decades to build such a vibrant website! Also, do you suggest checking if your chapters meet the criterias before you have actually written the complete first draft?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. This seems more useful for an editor or another author (who is reviewing your work). It’s a bit too in-depth average readers (my opinion). If I can even just get them to say why they like or dislike it, I’m doing well. For them to go into this much detail is asking way too much of them.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Thanks for directing me here! Nice checklist…I think a somewhat scaled down version would make a good feedback worksheet for beta readers. I like that you included a section on graphs, illustrations, and the like.

    Liked by 1 person

❄ ❅ ❆ Leave some Thoughts💭 or Comments💬

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: